Legal Opinion
Kevin Hotvedt and Mary Ann Hotvedt v. Schlumberger Limited (n.v.) and Schlumberger Well Services, a Division of Schlumberger Technology Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided October 2, 1991No. 90-2005Published
1Opinion of the Court
942 F.2d 294
Kevin HOTVEDT and Mary Ann Hotvedt, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
SCHLUMBERGER LIMITED (N.V.) and Schlumberger Well Services,
a Division of Schlumberger Technology Corporation,
Defendants-Appellees.
No. 90-2005.
United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.
Aug. 28, 1991.
Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc
Denied Oct. 2, 1991.
L. Steven Goldblatt, Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiffs-appellants.
David E. Warden, Christine L. Young, Robert J. Malinak, Baker & Botts, Houston, Tex., for defendants-appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas.
ON PETITION FOR…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Piper Aircraft Co. v. ReynoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Victor C. Baris v. Sulpicio Lines, Inc., Caltex Petroleum, Inc., Caltex Petroleum Corporation, and Caltex Oil CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
- Oram v. General American Oil Company of TexasTexas Supreme Court · 1974
- Dow Chemical Co. v. Castro AlfaroTexas Supreme Court · 1990
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.