Amberboy v. Societe De Banque Privee
Texas Supreme Court
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partDoggett, Justice
I concur in the court’s acceptance of this certified question but disagree with its answer. This writing seeks to clarify the proper function of the Texas .Supreme Court in responding to such queries and to explain why the answer provided in this particular case is erroneous.
I
In our federal system, proper deference should be given to our state courts in the *799interpretation of the unique law of each state. To further this objective the people of Texas approved a constitutional amendment specifically empowering this court to “answer questions of state law certified from a federal appellate…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- State v. BallSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
- Commonwealth v. EdmundsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Moreno v. Sterling Drug, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1990
- People v. BrisendineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Lucas v. United StatesTexas Supreme Court · 1988
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.