Legal Opinion

Stubbs v. Taft

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided March 31, 1959No. Ex. No. 9943PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPaolino, J.

This action of the case in the nature of conspiracy was brought under the provisions of general laws 1938, chapter 575, §50, now G. L. 1956, §33-18-17. The case is before us on the plaintiffs’ bill of exceptions to the decision of the trial justice sustaining the demurrers of both defendants to the declaration.

The plaintiffs, who are the heirs-at-law of Mabel L. Whit-marsh, late of the city of Cranston, deceased, brought the action for damages in behalf of and in the name of the estate of Mabel L. Whitmarsh as persons legally interested in said estate. At the time of the alleged conspiracy…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Providence Fruit & Produce Bldg., Inc. v. Gamco, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1949
  2. Hatton v. Howard Braiding Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1925
  3. Reynolds v. HennessySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1887
  4. Arnold v. BarringtonSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1922

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Guilbeault v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 2000
  2. ERI Max Entertainment, Inc. v. StreisandSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1997
  3. Fleet National Bank v. Anchor Media Television, Inc.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1993
  4. Smith v. O'CONNELLDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1998
  5. Read & Lundy, Inc. v. Washington Trust Co. of WesterlySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2004

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API