Legal Opinion

Smith v. O'CONNELL

District Court, D. Rhode Island

Decided March 17, 1998No. Civil Action 93-615-T, 93-660-T, 93-661-TPublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT

TORRES, District Judge.

The defendants in these cases have moved for summary judgment on the ground that the plaintiffs’ claims of childhood sexual abuse by priests serving in the Roman Catholic Diocese of Providence are barred by the statute of limitations. The principal issues presented are:

1. Whether a temporary inability to remember the alleged acts of abuse, a failure to recognize those acts as tortious or a difficulty in overcoming a reluctance to “re-live” the matter by initiating legal action constitutes a condition of “unsound mind” that…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Wood v. CarpenterSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  4. Vincent DeNOVELLIS, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. Donna E. SHALALA, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
  5. United States v. Plat 20, Lot 17Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Roe v. GelineauSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2002
  2. N.H. v. Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.)Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
  3. Ryan v. Roman Catholic Bishop of ProvidenceSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2008
  4. Doe v. HartzDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1999
  5. Martinelli v. Bridgeport Roman Catholic Diocesan Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1998

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API