Legal Opinion
ERI Max Entertainment, Inc. v. Streisand
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
Decided March 17, 1997No. 95-615-AppealPublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
This case came before a panel of the Supreme Court on February 18,1997, pursuant to an order that directed the plaintiff, ERI Max Entertainment, Inc., d.b.a. Vidi-O, and the defendants, Barbra Streisand; Blockbuster Entertainment Corporation (Blockbuster); Sony Music Entertainment, Inc. (Sony); Northeast Management, Inc., d.b.a. Blockbuster Video; Video Development Group, Inc., d.b.a. Blockbuster Video; and Video Consulting Group, Inc., d.b.a. Blockbuster Video, to show cause why the issues raised in this appeal should not be summarily decided. The plaintiff has appealed a Superior…
3Cases cited8 opinions
- Tampa Electric Co. v. Nashville Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Bragg v. Warwick Shoppers World, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1967
- Paddock Publications, Inc., Doing Business as the Daily Herald v. Chicago Tribune CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- State v. Eastern Coal CompanySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1908
- George v. George F. Berkander, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1961
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by29 opinions
- In Re Chocolate Confectionary Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
- In Re TFT-LCD (Flat Panel) Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2008
- In Re Dynamic Random Access Memory (DRAM) Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2007
- In Re Graphics Processing Units Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2007
- Guilbeault v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 2000
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.