Legal Opinion

Fleming & Associates v. Newby & Tittle

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided June 2, 2008No. 07-20277PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRADO, Circuit Judge:

In this case we review an award of attorneys’ fees that, regardless of our decision, will never be paid. Plaintiffs-Appellants brought this appeal, seeking vacatur of the district court’s imposition of compensatory attorneys’ fees in light of the settlement of their suit against Defendants-Appellees. For the following reasons, we AFFIRM the judgment of the district court with respect to its initial sanctions order but VACATE the attorneys’ fees portion of the district court’s judgment.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

The underlying litigation in this case is one of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. United States v. Munsingwear, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. U.S. Bancorp Mortgage Co. v. Bonner Mall PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Willy v. Coastal Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Goldin v. BartholowCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Shalaby v. Mansdorf (In Re Nakhuda)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  2. HM Electronics, Inc. v. R.F. Technologies, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2016
  3. Auto Parts Manufacturing Mississippi Inc. v. King Construction of Houston, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 2017
  4. Tesco Corporation v. National Oilwell Varco, L.P.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
  5. United States v. David Heredia-HolguinCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API