Legal Opinion

Bly v. Pool

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 25, 1916No. 7311PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error from District Court, Grady County; Frank M. Bailey, Judge. Action by Abram J. Pool and another against C. G. Bly and another. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

COLLIER, C.

This is an action brought by defendant in error to recover from the plaintiffs in error upon a note in the sum of $800, together with interest thereon from the 1st day of March, 1913, at the rate of 6 per cent, per annum and for interest thereafter at the rate of 12 per cent, per annum until paid and for foreclosure of a mortgage on the lands described in the petition.

The note and mortgage were originally executed by M. J. Armstrong to the Pittsburg Moi'tgage Investment Company and assigned by said company to Abram Pool, and subsequently assigned by the executor of Abram…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Moore v. NormanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  2. Smith v. School District No. 64Supreme Court of Kansas · 1913

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Woolfolk v. SemrodSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
  2. First National Bank of Davis v. BrittonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  3. Jarecki Manufacturing Co. v. FlemingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  4. Carter Oil Co. v. KennedySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  5. Damet v. Aetna Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API