Carter Oil Co. v. Kennedy
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtAndrews, J.
The plaintiff in error was defendant and the defendant in error was the plaintiff in the trial court, and the parties hereto will be referred to as they appeared therein.
The plaintiff instituted a suit in the district court of Osage county against the defendant, alleging that the defendant, without the consent or permission of the plaintiff, had “* * * wrongfully and unlawfully entered upon and taken possession of said above-described land and has wrongfully and unlawfully laid' pipe lines, made roads and buildings, tanks, fences, houses, buildings, boiler house, pump houses, laid pipe lines…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Jones v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Bly v. PoolSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Stuart v. GraysonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
3Cited by7 opinions
- Commercial Drilling Co. v. KennedySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Collins v. GravesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Skaggs v. Gypsy Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Loftis v. LaSalleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
- Silurian Oil Co. v. EssleyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1931
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.