Legal Opinion

Urban v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided November 3, 2014No. 10-434CPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Civil employment; Motion for summary judgment — RCFC 56; Living quarters allowance (LQA); Plaintiff did not meet eligibility requirements under DSSR § 031.12(b); Summary judgment motion granted.

OPINION

ALLEGRA, Judge:

This civilian employment case is pending before the court on defendant’s motion for summary judgment under RCFC 56. At issue is whether Craig S. Urban (plaintiff) is entitled to a living quarters allowance (LQA) under relevant Department of State regulations for his time spent in The Netherlands. For the reasons that follow, the court concludes that plaintiff is not so entitled…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Ricci v. DeStefanoSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  5. McAbee Construction, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Reyes Colon v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
  2. Thomas v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API