Legal Opinion

Lawrence v. Carey

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 11, 1922No. 10781Published

Error from District Court, Cotton County; Cham Jones, Judge. Action by Nellie Carey against A. D. Lawrence and others to cancel a certain oil and gas lease. Judgment holding the oil and gas lease valid and decreeing certain defendants to be the owners thereof and directing that A. D. Lawrence execute an assignment of said lease to certain defendants. A. D. Lawrence appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtMiller, J.

A. D. Lawrence, as plaintiff in error, prosecutes this appeal from a judgment of the district court of Cotton county, Okla., entered on the first day of February, 1919, decreeing that certain of the defendants in error were the owners of an interest in and to the oil and gas lease in controversy, and directing that the plaintiff in error execute to said defendants in error a good and sufficient assignment of said lease.

The attorney for plaintiff in error has, under date of June 3, 1922, filed in this, court the following suggestion;

“The plaintiff in error, A. D. Lawrence,, is now deceased and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Killough v. Ft. Supply Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  2. Doctors' Oil Co. v. AdairSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  3. Thomason, Co. Treas. v. Board of Com'rs of DelawareSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  4. State Ex Rel. S. P. Freeling v. TaylorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  5. Edmondson v. WellsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API