Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. S. P. Freeling v. Taylor

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 12, 1921No. 11740PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Original proceedings in mandamus instituted in this court. Action for peremptory writ of mandamus brought by the State of Oklahoma at the relation of S. P. Freeling, Attorney General, against W. R. Taylor, O. A. Cargill, T. J. Bodine, A. E. Bockoven, James F. Beaty, Anna Burke Love, and J. N. Abernathy, constituting and composing the Excise Board of Oklahoma County, State of Oklahoma.

1Opinion of the CourtMiller, J.

This is an original proceeding brought in this court by the state of Oklahoma, at the relation of S. P. Freeling, Attorney General, against W. R. Taylor, O. A. Cargill, T. J. Bodine, A. E. Bockoven, James F. Beaty, Anna Burke Love, and J. N. Abernathy, constituting and composing the excise board of Oklahoma county, Oklahoma, seeking a writ of mandamus to compel the excise board of Oklahoma county •to make a sufficient appropriation and levy of taxes for the year 1920 to enable the board of education of Oklahoma county to maintain the separate schools in the Oklahoma City district with like…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ingram v. GrovesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  2. Sanford v. MarkhamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  3. Edmondson v. WellsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  4. Lawrence v. CareySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API