Rotel Corp. of America v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
La whence, Judge:
Tbis cause of action relates to tbe proper classification for customs duty purposes of certain food juicers covered by tbe protests enumerated in schedule “A,” attached to and made a part of tbis decision.
Tbe facts upon which a determination is to be made have been agreed upon by tbe parties in a written stipulation, tbe pertinent portion of which is here set forth:
1. That tbe merchandise covered by tbe protests set forth in Schedule A affixed hereto and made a part hereof is described on the invoices as “Pood Juicers”, and consists of finished electrical food juicers…
2Cited by7 opinions
- F. B. Vandegrift & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964
- Kotake Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
- John A. Steer Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964
- Prestigeline v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1975
- Bloomfield Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.