Legal Opinion

Rotel Corp. of America v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided June 13, 1961No. 65798; protests 58/870, etc. (New York)PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

La whence, Judge:

Tbis cause of action relates to tbe proper classification for customs duty purposes of certain food juicers covered by tbe protests enumerated in schedule “A,” attached to and made a part of tbis decision.

Tbe facts upon which a determination is to be made have been agreed upon by tbe parties in a written stipulation, tbe pertinent portion of which is here set forth:

1. That tbe merchandise covered by tbe protests set forth in Schedule A affixed hereto and made a part hereof is described on the invoices as “Pood Juicers”, and consists of finished electrical food juicers…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. F. B. Vandegrift & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964
  2. Kotake Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
  3. John A. Steer Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964
  4. Prestigeline v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1975
  5. Bloomfield Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API