Legal Opinion

Bloomfield Industries, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided December 28, 1964No. 68974; protests 62/10040-12827, etc. (Chicago)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rao, Judge:

The protests enumerated in the schedule of protests, attached to this decision and made a part hereof, have been consolidated for purposes of trial. They relate to an importation of battery powered mixers or swizzle sticks. These items were assessed with duty at the rate of 17 per centum ad valorem, pursuant to the provisions of paragraph 839 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the Sixth Protocol of Supplementary Concessions to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 91 Treas. Dec. 150, T.D. 54108, for household articles, not specially provided for, wholly or in chief…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bruce Duncan Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960
  2. F. B. Vandegrift & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964
  3. Rotel Corp. of America v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
  4. Seprol, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Allied Western Dist., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
  2. Bloomfield Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
  3. James Loudon & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API