Legal Opinion

Garcia v. Conmed Corp.

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 8, 2012No. H034778PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PREMO, J.

—Plaintiff Andrew Garcia, a minor, by his guardian ad litem, Paul Garcia, sued Dr. Douglas Phan for medical malpractice and defendant ConMed Corporation for products liability after suffering injuries during a tonsillectomy in which Dr. Phan used an electrocautery device powered by a generator manufactured by defendant. After defendant’s argument to the jury, plaintiff moved for a mistrial grounded on misconduct of counsel during argument. The trial court found that defendant’s counsel, Genese Dopson, had engaged in misconduct, denied plaintiff’s motion, and admonished the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ballard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Cassim v. Allstate InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  3. People v. BandhauerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  4. City of Los Angeles v. DeckerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Sabella v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1969

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Bigler-Engler v. Breg, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2017
  2. Pope v. BabickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  3. Pearl v. City of L. A., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  4. Martinez v. Department of TransportationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  5. Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency v. Dhaliwal CA3California Court of Appeal · 2015

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API