Legal Opinion

Androws v. Coulter

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 16, 1931No. 22727. En BancPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

The appellant, Ada M. Androws, as administratrix of the estate of Gene Raligh, deceased, by an amended complaint (hereinafter spoken of as the complaint) against H. W. Coulter, seeks to recover for certain expenses incurred in the • last sickness and burial of the decedent. The complaint, upon alleging substantially that the defendant, a practicing physician and surgeon, unlawfully and criminally performed an operation upon Gene Raligh for the purpose of procuring an abortion so negligently and carelessly that septicaemia immediately resulted therefrom, further alleges:

“That the defendant was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Higgins v. McCreaSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Szadiwicz v. CantorMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
  3. Milliken v. HeddesheimerOhio Supreme Court · 1924

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Miller v. BennettSupreme Court of Virginia · 1949
  2. Nash v. MeyerIdaho Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Bowlan v. LunsfordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  4. Ryan v. PooleWashington Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Henrie v. GriffithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API