Legal Opinion

Szadiwicz v. Cantor

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 24, 1926PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBraley, J.

The jury could find that on February 6,1924, the defendant performed an operation upon the plaintiff’s intestate causing an abortion which not only destroyed embryonic fife but brought on general septicemia, a germ disease, from which after a period of conscious suffering at a hospital where on February 11, 1924, she went for medical treatment, the intestate died February 26, 1924. The medical evidence tended to show and it could be found that the defendant’s mode of treatment was very dangerous and surgically unsound because of the use of “non sterile instruments” which would be an adequate…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BrownMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
  2. Higgins v. McCreaSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Hall v. CorcoranMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
  4. Myers v. MeinrathMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
  5. Miller v. BayerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1896

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Miller v. BennettSupreme Court of Virginia · 1949
  2. Beauvais v. Springfield Institution for SavingsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  3. Thibault v. LalumiereMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
  4. Jekshewitz v. GroswaldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  5. Nash v. MeyerIdaho Supreme Court · 1934

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API