Legal Opinion

Kinsman v. Panek

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 29, 1968No. 16PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHeffernan, J.

In reviewing a trial court’s order following motions after verdict, whether it sustains or sets aside a jury’s verdict the same test is to be applied on appeal, namely:

“. . . that when there is any credible evidence which, under any reasonable view, fairly admits of an inference that supports the jury’s finding, neither the trial court nor this court should change the jury’s finding.” Rodenkirch v. Johnson (1960), 9 Wis. 2d 245, 248, 101 N. W. 2d 83.

Frequently, on appeal, the court’s decision on motions after verdict has been attacked by an appellant who seeks to set aside a verdict which has…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Lauson v. Town of Fond du LacWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Wells v. Dairyland Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Zillmer v. MiglautschWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Henthorn v. M. G. C. Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Rodenkirch v. JohnsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Merco Distributing Corp. v. Commercial Police Alarm Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Schnabl v. Ford Motor Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Schuster v. St. Vincent HospitalWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Nelson v. Travelers InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Ollinger v. GrallWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API