Schuster v. St. Vincent Hospital
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHeffernan, J.
The appellant’s basic contention, and upon the determination of which must hinge our decision of the case, is that the duty of a hospital toward a patient in respect to the custodial care given him is a duty higher than that of ordinary care. This higher duty, he argues, should be expressed as a duty of reasonable care. The trial judge concurred in plaintiff’s reasoning, but denied plaintiff’s motions on the ground that his instructions to the jury had made that distinction clear— that the jury was charged with assessing the hospital’s negligence in terms of that higher duty; but on that…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Osborne v. MontgomeryWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
- Wells v. Dairyland Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
- Savina v. Wisconsin Gas Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- Ernst v. GreenwaldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- Puls v. St. Vincent HospitalWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Johnson v. Misericordia Community HospitalWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
- Dumer v. St. Michael's HospitalWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
- Hoven v. KelbleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- Kastler v. Iowa Methodist HospitalSupreme Court of Iowa · 1971
- Ceplina v. South Milwaukee School BoardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.