Legal Opinion
Milk Industry Foundation v. Glickman
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided December 11, 1996No. Civil Action 96-2027 (PLF)PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.
In creating the Union, the Framers acknowledged the inherent right of the states to make compacts and agreements with each other subject only to the limitation that Congress must consent to such compacts: “No State shall, without the Consent of Congress ... enter into any Agreement or Compact with another State_” U.S. Const., Art. I, see. 10, cl. 3. A compact accorded congressional consent “is more than a supple device for dealing with interests confined within a region- [I]t ... also [can be] a means of safeguarding the national interest....” West…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Power Mobility Coalition v. LeavittDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- Daliberti v. Republic of IraqDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2000
- Blackman v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
- Milk Industry Foundation v. GlickmanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
- Lightfoot v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.