Legal Opinion

Smith v. CANTON SCHOOL DIST. NO. 41-1

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 18, 1999No. NonePublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SABERS, Justice (on reassignment)

[¶ 1.] Brian and Amy Smith, James Frankman, Debra DeKnikker, Kevin and Bethany Meuret, and Twin Creek Development, LLC (collectively, Petitioners) appealed the denial of their petition for a minor boundary change by the Canton School Board (Board) to the circuit court. The circuit court reversed the Board’s decision. Canton School District appeals. We affirm the circuit court.

FACTS

[¶ 2.] Twin Creek Development (Twin Creek) comprises approximately 72 acres of land platted into 33 lots in section 21, Springdale Township, Lincoln County, South Dakota. The entire…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Moran v. Rapid City Area School District No. 51-4South Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Strain v. Rapid City School BoardSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Kellogg v. Hoven School District No. 53-2South Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Colman-Egan School District No. 50-5 v. JonesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Lennox School District No. 41-4South Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Hanson v. Minnehaha County CommissionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Kirby v. HOVEN SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 53-2South Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Pruchniak v. School Board of Elk Point-Jefferson School District 61-7South Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Schaefer v. Tea Area School District 41-5South Dakota Supreme Court · 2015

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API