Smith v. CANTON SCHOOL DIST. NO. 41-1
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
SABERS, Justice (on reassignment)
[¶ 1.] Brian and Amy Smith, James Frankman, Debra DeKnikker, Kevin and Bethany Meuret, and Twin Creek Development, LLC (collectively, Petitioners) appealed the denial of their petition for a minor boundary change by the Canton School Board (Board) to the circuit court. The circuit court reversed the Board’s decision. Canton School District appeals. We affirm the circuit court.
FACTS
[¶ 2.] Twin Creek Development (Twin Creek) comprises approximately 72 acres of land platted into 33 lots in section 21, Springdale Township, Lincoln County, South Dakota. The entire…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Moran v. Rapid City Area School District No. 51-4South Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
- Strain v. Rapid City School BoardSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
- Kellogg v. Hoven School District No. 53-2South Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
- Colman-Egan School District No. 50-5 v. JonesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Johnson v. Lennox School District No. 41-4South Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- Hanson v. Minnehaha County CommissionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
- Kirby v. HOVEN SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 53-2South Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- Pruchniak v. School Board of Elk Point-Jefferson School District 61-7South Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- Schaefer v. Tea Area School District 41-5South Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.