State v. Pagon
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WELLS, Judge.
Defendant assigns as error that the trial court failed to exclude on its own motion statements defendant made in the police car, despite the fact that defendant’s trial counsel did not object to introduction of the statements. A defendant who fails to object to admission of evidence may not later complain about its introduction, even on constitutional grounds. State v. Mitchell, 276 N.C. 404, 172 S.E. 2d 527 (1970). Where, however, it appears on the face of the record that defendant’s confession was obtained in violation of his constitutional rights, the court may have the duty…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- North Carolina v. ButlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- State v. McKinneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- State v. WeaverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- State v. HatcherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. DowCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
- State v. HurstSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
- State v. HurstCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- State v. SpencerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
- State v. SeagrovesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.