Legal Opinion

Principal Life Insurance v. Caremark PCS Health, LLC

District Court, S.D. Iowa

Decided October 9, 2014No. 4:14-cv-00077-JEGPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

JAMES E. GRITZNER, Chief Judge.

This matter comes before the Court ón Motion to Compel Arbitration, ECF No. 26, by Caremark PCS Health, L.L.C. (Defendant). Plaintiffs Principal Life Insurance Company, the Principal Welfare Benefit Plan for Employees, and the Principal Welfare Benefit Plan for Individual Field (collectively, Plaintiffs) resist. Neither party requested an oral argument on this Motion, and the Court finds that an oral argument is unnecessary for the resolution of this matter. The Motion is fully submitted and ready for disposition.

I. BACKGROUND

Defendant is a vendor of…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Hall Street Associates, L. L. C. v. Mattel, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
  5. Stolt-Nielsen S. A. v. AnimalFeeds International Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2010

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Management Registry, Inc. v. A.W. Companies, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API