Legal Opinion

Nancy Sanders v. McLaren-macomb

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided February 27, 2018No. 336409PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBorrello, J.

In this interlocutory appeal in a medical malpractice action, defendants Richard S. Veyna, M.D., Michigan Head and Spine Institute (MHSI), and University Neurosurgical Associates, PC (UNA) 1 appeal by leave granted 2 the trial court's order *308 granting plaintiff's motion for reconsideration and denying defendants' motion for summary disposition. The trial court denied defendants' motion for summary disposition on the ground that defendants failed to comply with MCR 2.112(L)(2)(a) in challenging plaintiff's notice of intent (NOI) to file a claim. For the reasons set forth in this opinion, we…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Odom v. Wayne CountyMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Roberts v. Mecosta County General HospitalMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Bush v. ShabahangMichigan Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Scarsella v. PollakMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Driver v. NainiMichigan Supreme Court · 2011

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Law Offices of Jeffrey Sherbow, PC v. Fieger & Fieger, PCMichigan Court of Appeals · 2019
  2. TM v. MZMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018
  3. Auto-Owners Insurance Company v. Compass Healthcare PlcMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018
  4. Auto-Owners Insurance Company v. Compass Healthcare PlcMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018
  5. Charles Louis Van Fleteren Jr v. Thomas J ShugarMichigan Court of Appeals · 2019

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API