Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Koken v. Smith

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 1, 1989No. 87-1542Published

1ConcurrenceHornsby, Chief Justice

The Court reaches a conclusion with which I concur. I agree that Mr. Koken’s right to build on his land has been unreasonably interfered with; however, I reach this conclusion via a path different from that taken by the majority. I would hold *278that the strictures of Ala.Code 1975, § 11-52-35, relied on by the authorities of the City of Huntsville to deny Koken a building permit, do not apply in this particular instance.

My reasoning in this matter rests upon the proposition that zoning laws and planning laws that restrict the use an owner may make of land must be strictly construed. In Smith v.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Knutson v. State Ex Rel. SebergerIndiana Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Smith v. City of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  3. Baltimore Planning Commission v. Victor Development Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1971
  4. Boxell v. Planning CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API