Legal Opinion

Sisk v. Crump

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 1887No. 13,573PublishedCited by 27 opinions

From the Bartholomew Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

Stated in a condensed form, the material allegations of the appellant’s complaint are these: On and prior to May 5th, 1885, the appellee owned fifteen acres of land, bounded on the east by a public street of the city of Columbus, and along the line of this street he had constructed a barbed wire fence. The fence was composed of wooden posts and five strings of barbed iron wire. It was negligently constructed; the posts being insufficient to keep the wire at a proper tension, and the wires were not drawn into proper position. The wires were armed with sharp iron barbs placed along them at a…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Beck v. . CarterNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  2. Evansville & Terre Haute Railroad v. GriffinIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Nave v. FlackIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Indianapolis, Peru & Chicago Railway Co. v. PitzerIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Graves v. ThomasIndiana Supreme Court · 1884

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Faris v. HobergIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Thiele v. McManusIndiana Court of Appeals · 1891
  3. Jones v. HernandezIndiana Court of Appeals · 1970
  4. Hurd v. LacySupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  5. Carskaddon v. MillsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1892

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API