Sisk v. Crump
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Bartholomew Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.
Stated in a condensed form, the material allegations of the appellant’s complaint are these: On and prior to May 5th, 1885, the appellee owned fifteen acres of land, bounded on the east by a public street of the city of Columbus, and along the line of this street he had constructed a barbed wire fence. The fence was composed of wooden posts and five strings of barbed iron wire. It was negligently constructed; the posts being insufficient to keep the wire at a proper tension, and the wires were not drawn into proper position. The wires were armed with sharp iron barbs placed along them at a…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Beck v. . CarterNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
- Evansville & Terre Haute Railroad v. GriffinIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Nave v. FlackIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
- Indianapolis, Peru & Chicago Railway Co. v. PitzerIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- Graves v. ThomasIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Faris v. HobergIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
- Thiele v. McManusIndiana Court of Appeals · 1891
- Jones v. HernandezIndiana Court of Appeals · 1970
- Hurd v. LacySupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
- Carskaddon v. MillsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1892
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.