Legal Opinion
Weinstock v. Wilk
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided December 16, 2003No. CIV.3:02CV1326(PCD)PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
DORSEY, Senior District Judge.
Defendant moves for summary judgment, arguing there are no genuine issues of material fact and that he is thereby entitled to judgment as a matter of law. The motion is granted.
I. BACKGROUND 1
On October 27, 1999 Defendant Timothy Wilk, a Southington Police Officer, responded to an accident (the “Accident”) involving three vehicles. When he arrived at the scene, only two vehicles remained. The third had fled the scene (the “fleeing vehicle”).
Defendant learned that the fleeing vehicle had triggered a chain reaction…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Shelley Weinstock v. Columbia UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Grishelda Bryant v. John J. Maffucci, Dawn Thackeray, Yvonne Powell, Norwood Jackson and Dr. Edward AllanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Horton v. Portsmouth Police DepartmentSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2011
- Sharnick v. D'ArchangeloDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2013
- Henshaw v. DohertySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2005
- Coggins v. County of NassauDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2017
- Cucuta v. New York CityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.