Legal Opinion
Sharnick v. D'Archangelo
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided March 22, 2013No. Civil No. 3:11CV945(AVC)PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*440 RULING ON THE DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
ALFRED V. COVELLO, District Judge.
This is an action to recover compensatory damages and punitive damages to redress an alleged violation of the plaintiffs rights to freedom from false arrest, false imprisonment, and malicious prosecution. The plaintiff, Richard Sharnick, brings this action against Officer Dennis D’Archangelo and Detective Frank A. Podpolucha. The defendants have each filed motions for summary judgment, arguing that they are entitled to judgment as a matter of law. D’Archangelo’s motion is DENIED and Podpolucha’s motion is…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Conroy v. CaronDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2017
- Lawson v. HilderbrandDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2015
- Alberty v. HunterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2025
- Bilyard v. PierceDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2024
- Brown v. NeddermannDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2020
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.