Western Colorado Power Co. v. Public Utilities Commission
Supreme Court of Colorado
1DissentJustice Frantz
By holding that Colorado-Ute is what it cannot be, the majority has effectively incapacitated it as the supplier of energy for its members. The reasoning of the majority, simply stated, is this: Colorado-Ute is a public' utility. Its existence as a public utility is offensive to the law of this state relating to regulated monopolies. This conclusion flows from the finding of the Commission, supported by evidence, that there were other sources available from which the members of Colorado-Ute could obtain energy. There being other sources, the Hayden plant is a duplication of facilities, which…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Civil Rights CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Frost & Frost Trucking Co. v. Railroad Comm'n of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Smith v. CahoonSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Chas. Wolff Packing Co. v. Court of Industrial RelationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Stephenson v. BinfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.