Boyd v. Scott
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Per curiam
In this appeal by the Attorney General and the Director of the Department of Criminal Justice of the State of Texas, Respondents-Appellants Wayne Scott and Dan Morales (hereafter “Scott”), challenge a district court order granting Petitioner-Appellee Michael Boyd a writ of habeas corpus. Scott asserts that the district court erred in concluding that Boyd’s trial was fundamentally unfair as a result of the state trial court’s giving an Allen charge that unconstitutionally coerced the jury into reaching a verdict. Scott also contends that, as the state court of appeals based its rejection of…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Allen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Harris v. ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Henderson v. KibbeSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Amos v. ScottCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
- Coleman v. DretkeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
- Montoya v. ScottCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
- Daniel Lee Corwin v. Gary L. Johnson, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
- Hatten v. QuartermanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.