Legal Opinion

Boyd v. Scott

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided December 29, 1994No. 93-8563UnpublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Per curiam

In this appeal by the Attorney General and the Director of the Department of Criminal Justice of the State of Texas, Respondents-Appellants Wayne Scott and Dan Morales (hereafter “Scott”), challenge a district court order granting Petitioner-Appellee Michael Boyd a writ of habeas corpus. Scott asserts that the district court erred in concluding that Boyd’s trial was fundamentally unfair as a result of the state trial court’s giving an Allen charge that unconstitutionally coerced the jury into reaching a verdict. Scott also contends that, as the state court of appeals based its rejection of…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Allen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  4. Harris v. ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Henderson v. KibbeSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Amos v. ScottCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
  2. Coleman v. DretkeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
  3. Montoya v. ScottCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
  4. Daniel Lee Corwin v. Gary L. Johnson, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
  5. Hatten v. QuartermanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API