Legal Opinion

Gilmore v. Western Coal & Mining Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 8, 1922No. 23,678PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Crawford district court; division No. 1; Andrew J. Curran, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Burch, J.:

The action was one for compensation. The injury was a schedule injury — loss of an eye — and the arbitrator awarded *159compensation in a lump sum. The court modified the award to one for periodical payments, and the plaintiff appeals.

(Filed May 25, 1922.)

When the legislature revised the workmen’s compensation act in 1917 it provided for payment of compensation for the first week of disability, partial in character but permanent in quality, and then provided as follows:

“Thereafter, compensation in a lump sum shall be paid as provided in the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Boyd v. J. R. Crowe Coal & Mining Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1919

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cogdill v. Aetna Life InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Young v. Shellabarger Mill & Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1927
  3. Ismert Hincke Milling Co. v. EllisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924
  4. Shumona v. Armour & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API