Legal Opinion
Elliott v. Cabeen
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided November 8, 1963No. Civ. A. No. 7919PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ARRAJ, Chief Judge.
This matter is before the Court on defendant’s Motion to Dismiss or, in lieu thereof, to set aside service of process on the grounds that defendant, as a resident of the State of California, is not subject to service of process within the District of Colorado and that he has not been properly served with process in this action. The additional grounds urged by defendant need not be considered here in view of the disposition we make of this case.
Suit is based on an alleged oral contract by virtue of which plaintiff agreed to work as a land man for defendant. Plaintiff is a…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Hess v. PawloskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Bomze v. Nardis Sportswear, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Worland v. WorlandNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1976
- George v. LewisDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1964