Legal Opinion

City of Cockrell Hill v. Johnson

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 7, 2001No. 2-00-268-CV, 2-00-338-CVPublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DAUPHINOT, Justice.

I. Introduction

In this whistleblower case, the City of Cockrell Hill, Aldermen Robert Lowther, Linda McCoy, and Kurt Smith, and Mayor Leo Landin appeal from the trial court’s denial of their plea to the jurisdiction and motion for summary judgment as to Elizabeth Johnson’s whistleblower claims. In addition, Bob Johnson appeals from the trial court’s granting of the City, Aider-men, and Mayor’s plea to the jurisdiction and motion for summary judgment on his whistleblower and libel and slander claims. We reverse and render in part and affirm in part.

II. Background Facts

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Texas Ass'n of Business v. Texas Air Control BoardTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Bland Independent School District v. BlueTexas Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Davis v. PassmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Mayhew v. Town of SunnyvaleTexas Supreme Court · 1998

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Perry v. Greanias, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2002
  2. Temple v. City of Houston, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2006
  3. City of Weatherford v. Catron, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2002
  4. Texas State Technical College v. Cressman, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2005
  5. City of Fort Worth v. DeOreoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2003

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API