Legal Opinion

Bonanza Corp. v. Durbin

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided March 11, 1985No. 83SC86, 83SC102 and 84SC275PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DUBOFSKY, Justice.

We granted certiorari and consolidated review of three Court of Appeals’ orders dismissing appeals on the basis that the appellants’ motions for new trial or to alter or amend judgment had not been timely filed in the district court. Because we conclude that the provision in C.R.C.P. 6(e) allowing three extra days for motions to be filed after the receipt of mailed notice applies to extend the fifteen days allowed for motions for new trial or to alter or amend judgment under C.R.C.P. 59, we vacate the orders of the Court of Appeals and remand for consideration of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sonnenblick-Goldman Corp. v. Thomas NowalkCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
  2. Schuster v. ZwickerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
  3. Poor v. DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR ARAPAHOE COUNTYSupreme Court of Colorado · 1976
  4. Pittman v. DunlapColorado Court of Appeals · 1984

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. People ex rel. S.M.A.M.A.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Cadnetix Corp. v. City of BoulderColorado Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. In Re the Marriage of MalewiczColorado Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. Littlefield v. BambergerColorado Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. 1629 Joint Venture v. DahlquistColorado Court of Appeals · 1991

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API