Legal Opinion

Littlefield v. Bamberger

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided August 3, 2000No. 99CA1780PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge TAUBMAN.

In this appeal by defendants Alvin R., Jacob A., and Kris A. Bamberger, the dispos-itive issue is whether a party filing a post-trial motion is afforded three days for mailing pursuant to C.R.C.P. 6(e) when the notice of entry of judgment is mailed. We hold that the three-day provision applies and, therefore, conclude defendants timely filed their C.R.C.P. 59 motion and that this appeal was timely filed. In so ruling, we conclude that Bonanza Corp. v. Durbin, 696 P.2d 818 (Colo.1985) is dispositive and therefore decline to follow Wilson v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Co.,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bonanza Corp. v. DurbinSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
  2. 1629 Joint Venture v. DahlquistColorado Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. Wilson v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1996

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People ex rel. S.M.A.M.A.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. In Re the Marriage of MalewiczColorado Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. Janssen v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. Janssen v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. Janssen v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API