Legal Opinion

Sullivan v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided March 11, 2010No. 09-CF-414PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

THOMPSON, Associate Judge:

On March 27, 2009, the Superior Court convicted appellant, John Sullivan, of failure to register as a sex offender, in violation of the District of Columbia Sex Offender Registration Act of 1999 (“SORA” or “the Act”). See D.C.Code §§ 22^014, 22-4015 (2001). 1 Appellant challenges his conviction on the ground that he was not required to register under SORA because, prior to the statute’s enactment, he was released from custody in connection with the sex offense of which he was convicted, and because his post-SORA conviction of driving without a license is not the type…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Department of Housing and Urban Development v. RuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  2. Davis v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. Graves v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. In Re Doe (" Sd")District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. Jeffrey v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Everton v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API