Legal Opinion
In Re Doe (" Sd")
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided July 29, 2004No. 01-SP-894PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GLICKMAN, Associate Judge:
Appellant “Stanley Doe” (a pseudonym employed in the trial court proceedings), whom we shall refer to as “S.D.” though his actual initials are different, entered a guilty plea in federal court to one count of Interstate Travel with Intent to Engage in Sexual Acts with a Minor, a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2423(b). After S.D. served time in prison and was placed on supervised release, he moved to the District of Columbia. The Court Services and Offender Supervision Agency (“CSOSA”) notified S.D. that he had to register as a sex offender under the District of Columbia’s…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. Martin Molina Oviedo, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- Butler v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- Harris v. District of Columbia Office of Worker's CompensationDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- German v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Richardson v. EasterlingDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
- Hix v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2005
- Washington v. District of Columbia Department of Public WorksDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- Commonwealth v. Vann BellMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2006
- Davis v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.