Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Special Commodity Group on Non-Rubber Footwear From Brazil v. Baldridge

United States Court of International Trade

Decided November 23, 1983No. Court 83-3-00458PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

CARMAN, Judge:

INTRODUCTION

In this action, plaintiff seeks, among other things, a writ of mandamus to compel the Secretary of the Treasury and the Commissioner of Customs to liquidate certain entries of non-rubber footwear imported from Brazil. Plaintiff also moves for a preliminary injunction to enjoin the Secretary of Commerce (a) from issuing a final determination in an annual administrative review of a countervailing duty order under section 751 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. § 1675(a) (1982), covering January 4, 1980 to December 31, 1980…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. S. J. Stile Associates Ltd. v. SnyderCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1981
  4. United States v. Uniroyal, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1982
  5. United States Cane Sugar Refiners' Ass'n v. BlockCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1982

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988
  2. Tianjin Magnesium Intern. Co., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2008
  3. Sharp Electronics Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1989
  4. NSK LTD. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
  5. Footwear Distributors & Retailers of America v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API