Matsushita Electric Industrial Co. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
TSOUCALAS, Judge:
The long and tortuous history of this case, which involves events occurring during the past 8-15 years, is extremely troublesome. The multitude of motions and correspondence submitted by the parties is alarming, yet, in essence they all focus on the authority Commerce possesses, and the process Commerce should employ, in revoking an antidumping duty order. Plaintiffs challenge delays by Commerce in completing annual administrative reviews, delays in issuing a final decision on revocation, and the decision by Commerce to initiate another…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Federal Trade Commission v. Standard Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Freeport Minerals Company, (Freeport-Mcmoran, Inc.) v. The United States, Shell Canada Resources Ltd. And Canadian Superior Oil, Ltd., IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Philipp Bros., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986
- Sharp Corp., and Toshiba Corp. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- American Permac, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Hyundai Electronics Co., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1999
- Timken Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1997
- Koyo Seiko Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1989
- Nakajima All Co., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988
- Sharp Electronics Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1990
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.