Legal Opinion

Maybach v. Falstaff Brewing Corp.

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided July 11, 1949No. 41169PublishedCited by 63 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClark, P. J.

Plaintiff was injured by the explosion of two bottles of Falstaff beer which she was removing from a shelf in a Kroger store.. She sued The Falstaff Brewing Company and The Kroger Company. Verdict and judgment went for both defendants. The trial court sustained plaintiff’s motion for new trial as to the Falstaff Company and that company appeals.

The trial court gave as his reason for granting a new trial that error was committed in giving the following instruction:

“The Court instructs the jury that in reaching a decision on the issue of negligence, you may not base your verdict entirely and…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Harke v. HaaseSupreme Court of Missouri · 1934
  2. Stolle v. Anheuser-Busch Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1925
  3. Zichler v. St. Louis Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1933
  4. Zesch v. the Abrasive Co. of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Missouri · 1944
  5. Charlton Ex Rel. Charlton v. LovelaceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1943

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by63 opinions

  1. Harder v. F.C. Clinton, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
  2. Hasemeier v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1962
  3. Kansas City Southern Railway Co. v. Payway Feed Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1960
  4. Brown v. ThomasMissouri Court of Appeals · 1958
  5. Venditti v. St. Louis Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1951

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API