Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Cook

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 23, 1999PublishedCited by 222 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CAPPY, Justice.

The sole issue presented in this appeal is whether the police officers demonstrated the requisite cause to stop appellant and recover the contraband discarded by him pursuant to Article 1, Section 8 of the Pennsylvania Constitution. For the reasons which follow, we agree with the lower courts and hold that the police officers demonstrated reasonable suspicion sufficient to permit a stop and thus, could lawfully recover the contraband abandoned by appellant.

As the issue before us stems from the ruling of the suppression court our standard of review is limited. When…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. California v. Hodari D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Commonwealth v. HicksSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  4. Commonwealth v. MatosSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  5. Commonwealth v. MelendezSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by222 opinions

  1. In the Interest of D.M.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  2. Commonwealth v. ChaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  3. Commonwealth v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  4. Commonwealth v. RogersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  5. Commonwealth v. HolmesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011

217 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API