CSC Holdings, Inc. v. Kimtron, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Florida
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
K. MICHAEL MOORE, District Judge.
THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (DE #48).
UPON CONSIDERATION of the Motion, responses and the pertinent portions of the record, and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, the Court enters the following Order.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff CSC Holdings, Inc. (“CSC”) brings this action against Defendants alleging they engaged in the illegal practice of selling pirate decoders that allow their users to intercept CSC’s cable signals. CSC filed a three-count amended complaint alleging violations of 47 U.S.C. §§ 553(a)(1) and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Dr. Raymond G. Tronzo v. Biomet, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- International Cablevision, Inc. D/B/A Adelphia Cable v. John Sykes and Marvin NoelCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- United States v. William C. NorrisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- Provence v. Palm Beach Taverns, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
- Mitsubishi International Corporation, Plaintiff-Counterclaim-Defendant-Appellant v. Cardinal Textile Sales, Inc. United General Marketing, Inc., Classic Sales, Inc., Charles W. Jones and Robert E. Lee, Defendants-Crossclaim- General Sales & Leasing Co., Defendant-Counterclaim-Plaintiff-Crossclaim- Fibertex Textile Supplies, Inc., Defendant-Crossclaim-Defendant-Crossclaim-Plaintiff, Purvis-Sikkelee International, Ltd. And Skein Dyers of America, Inc., Defendants-Crossclaim-Defendants-Appellees, Raymond B. Lippincott, Iii, William J. Purvis, William L. Sikkelee and Consolidated Trading Co., Joseph Lee Smith, Defendants-Crossclaim-Defendants, Hershel Nunley, Defendants-Crossclaim-Plaintiffs, United States of America, Movants. Mitsubishi International Corporation, Plaintiff-Counterclaim-Defendant-Appellant v. Cardinal Textile Sales, Inc., Defendants-Crossclaim-Plaintiffs, General Sales & Leasing Co., Defendant-Counterclaim-Plaintiff-Crossclaim-Plaintiff, Fibertex Textile Supplies, Inc., Defendant-Crossclaim-Defendant-Crossclaim-Plaintiff, Purvis-Sikkelee International, Ltd. And Skein Dyers of America, Inc., Defendants-Crossclaim-Defendants-Appellees, Raymond B. Lippincott, William J. Purvis and William L. Sikkelee, Hershel Nunley, Defendants-Crossclaim-Plaintiff, United States of America, MovantsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Prostar v. MassachiCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
- New Lenox Industries, Inc. v. FentonDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2007