Legal Opinion

Wilsey State Bank v. Amend

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 5, 1920No. 22,414PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Morris district court; Roswell L. KING, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

MASON, J.:

The Wilsey State Bank sued Anthony E. Amend and his wife upon four promissory notes executed by them to W. E. Stuart Land Company, the plaintiff claiming by indorsement before maturity as a holder in due course. The defendants filed a verified answer which, in addition to a general denial and other matters not necessary to be stated, alleged that the plaintiff held the notes merely for collection; that they were given as a part of the price of real estate at the time of the execution of a written contract (which was set out) for its purchase…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Manley v. ParkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  2. Greene v. McAuleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1905
  3. Yost v. GuinnSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920
  4. Soper v. GabeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1895

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Stumfoll v. InmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1961
  2. First National Bank v. GreathouseSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  3. State Bank v. KinnettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  4. Wilsey State Bank v. AmendSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  5. Richardson v. Business Men's Protective Ass'nSupreme Court of Kansas · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API