Legal Opinion · Dissent

Richardson v. Business Men's Protective Ass'n

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 8, 1930No. 29,055Published

1DissentHarvey, J.

I must differ from my associates on the rule of practice stated in syllabus 2 and treated in the opinion. My view is this: There is but one time in the trial of a case to a jury when it is important that the instructions be correct, and that is when they are read to the jury. Assuming, as we must, that both the court and counsel for the litigants desire controverted issues submitted to the jury to be determined in accordance with correct principles of law applicable to them, they should, in their respective positions, endeavor to have the instructions so framed that this can be done. The…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Cobe v. Coughlin Hardware Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1910
  2. State v. BellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1926
  3. Koshka v. Missouri Pacific Railroad CompanySupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  4. Brown v. Union Oil Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  5. Collis v. KraftSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API