Legal Opinion

Stumfoll v. Inman

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 8, 1961No. 42,326 and 42,327PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Fatzer, J.:

These actions were to recover damages for injuries sustained in a car-truck collision. The principal question presented is whether service of summons was properly had upon defendant Woodrow Inman in Cherokee County, Kansas. It is conceded that all other defendants, W. E. Mitchell, Freeto Construction Company, a corporation, and Independent Construction Company, a corporation, hereafter referred to as Mitchell, Freeto, and Independent, were served with summons elsewhere. Plence, if service of summons upon Inman was not proper in Cherokee…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Dryden v. RogersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
  2. Sutherland v. SutherlandSupreme Court of Kansas · 1961
  3. Arnette v. ArnetteSupreme Court of Kansas · 1947
  4. Ford v. PeckSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924
  5. Sundberg v. Boeing Airplane Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1958

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lines v. City of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1978
  2. Grimmett v. BurkeCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1995
  3. Loucks v. McCormickSupreme Court of Kansas · 1967
  4. Threadgill v. BeardSupreme Court of Kansas · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API