Legal Opinion

Strobel v. Park

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 6, 1927No. Appeal, 146PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Kephart,

The deceased, on his way to an office where he was employed, was a passenger on an elevator owned and operated by defendant. The car or cage in which he was riding was of the arc or curved type, number six in the series of elevators. It was used for freight and passenger service. The chief difference between this and other elevators in the building was that the whole front of the cage facing the floor landings was entirely open and unprotected, there being no collapsible safety gate or other protection. The two sides and the rear of this elevator, as well as the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Munsey v. WebbSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Gallivan v. Wark Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  3. Petrie v. Kaufmann & Baer Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  4. Fredericks v. Atlantic Refining Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  5. Wehle v. United States Mutual Accident Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1897

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Ebbert v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  2. Rozumailski v. Philadelphia Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  3. Straight v. B. F. Goodrich Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  4. Liguori v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  5. Mars v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API