Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Nixon

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided April 25, 1983No. CM 442669PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*1030OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

Appellant was charged with an unauthorized absence and with forcible sodomy in violation of Articles 86 and 125, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 886 and 925 (1976), to which he pleaded guilty and not guilty, respectively. The providency of appellant’s plea to the unauthorized absence was established during a thorough Care1 inquiry after which the military judge entered a finding of guilty to that offense.

Appellant requested a court-martial composed of officers for the trial of the sodomy charge and to sentence him. After the court members were assembled and…

3Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Michelson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. United States v. CareUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
  3. United States v. Samuel B. Hewitt and Bobby Gene ChesserCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
  4. United States v. William Curtis, IIICourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
  5. United States v. CaszattUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1960

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. RiveraUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
  2. United States v. SmithUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
  3. United States v. BolandU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1986
  4. United States v. KitchingU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1986
  5. United States v. KylesU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API