Legal Opinion

City of Sacramento v. State of California

California Supreme Court

Decided January 29, 1990No. S006188PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

50 Cal.3d 51 (1990)

785 P.2d 522

266 Cal. Rptr. 139

CITY OF SACRAMENTO et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants,

v.

THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Docket No. S006188.

Supreme Court of California.

January 29, 1990.

COUNSEL

James P. Jackson, City Attorney, and William P. Carnazzo, Deputy City Attorney, for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

John K. Van de Kamp, Attorney General, N. Eugene Hill, Assistant Attorney General, Paul H. Dobson, Richard M. Frank, Floyd D. Shimomura and Carol Hunter, Deputy Attorneys General, for Defendants and Respondents.

De Witt W. Clinton, County Counsel (Los…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Hodel v. Virginia Surface Mining & Reclamation Assn., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. National League of Cities v. UserySupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Bernhard v. Bank of America National Trust & Saving AssociationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Abelleira v. District Court of AppealCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Department of Finance v. Commission on State MandatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Department of Finance v. Commission on State MandatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API