Legal Opinion

Holsclaw v. Catalina Savings & Loan Association

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided November 30, 1970No. 2 CA-CIV 714PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EUBANK, Presiding Judge.

The principal question- placed before us in this litigation is whether a recipient of funds paid to satisfy a mortgage was the collection agent of the holders of the mort gage. The trial court held that the agency relationship was established, and that the mortgage debt was discharged. We affirm the holding.

The trial court made comprehensive findings of fact, and appellants have not seen fit to challenge any particular finding. We are bound by the findings, unless clear error is apparent.

On October 14, 1959, people named Bartley, then owners of the land in question,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Brutinel v. NygrenArizona Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Canyon State Canners, Inc. v. HooksArizona Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Daru v. MartinArizona Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Land-Air, Inc. v. ParkerArizona Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Arizona Storage & Distributing Co. v. RynningArizona Supreme Court · 1930

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Goodman v. Physical Resource Engineering, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
  2. United Missouri Bank, N.A. v. BeardMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. Browne v. NowlinArizona Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Frei v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1979
  5. Henry v. Flagstaff Medical Center, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API