Legal Opinion

Henry v. Flagstaff Medical Center, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided April 20, 2006No. 1 CA-CV 05-0123Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EHRLICH, Judge.

¶ 1 Loretta Henry1 appeals the denial of a requested jury instruction regarding the definition of ostensible or apparent agency and the grant of a new trial to the Flagstaff Medical Center (“FMC”). FMC cross-appeals the denial of its motion for judgment as a matter of law (“JMOL”). We conclude that FMC was entitled to JMOL. Accordingly, we reverse and remand this matter to the superior court for the entry of a judgment in favor of FMC.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

¶2 In February 2000, Mrs. Henry was pregnant. When she began experiencing abdominal pain, she sought care…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Sword v. NKC Hospitals, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Capan v. Divine Providence HospitalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Gulf Insurance v. GrishamArizona Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Barassi v. MatisonArizona Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Beeck v. Tucson General HospitalCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API