Henry v. Flagstaff Medical Center, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EHRLICH, Judge.
¶ 1 Loretta Henry1 appeals the denial of a requested jury instruction regarding the definition of ostensible or apparent agency and the grant of a new trial to the Flagstaff Medical Center (“FMC”). FMC cross-appeals the denial of its motion for judgment as a matter of law (“JMOL”). We conclude that FMC was entitled to JMOL. Accordingly, we reverse and remand this matter to the superior court for the entry of a judgment in favor of FMC.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
¶2 In February 2000, Mrs. Henry was pregnant. When she began experiencing abdominal pain, she sought care…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Sword v. NKC Hospitals, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1999
- Capan v. Divine Providence HospitalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Gulf Insurance v. GrishamArizona Supreme Court · 1980
- Barassi v. MatisonArizona Supreme Court · 1981
- Beeck v. Tucson General HospitalCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.