Legal Opinion
In re the Claim of Zaichik
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 5, 2007PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*617Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed June 13, 2006, which ruled, inter alia, that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.
Claimant briefly worked for the employer as a marketing representative. She was terminated from her position after she failed to report to work or call in for four days. Although she initially received unemployment insurance benefits, the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board subsequently ruled that she was disqualified from receiving them…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In re Claim of KanelaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- In re the Claim of SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- In re the Claim of FelderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- In re the Claim of SundinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re the Claim of FeiermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- In re the Claim of GoldnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Matter of Gaffney (Commissioner of Labor)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2025
- Matter of Hamlin (Commissioner of Labor)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2025